A Virginia judge has once again denied an effort to halt the state’s new redistricting plan, allowing a Democratic-backed constitutional amendment on congressional maps to proceed despite mounting lawsuits and partisan tension. The attempted legal block, brought by Republican lawmakers and circuit court clerks, claimed the state legislature overstepped its authority in launching a special session to redraw districts amid nationwide gerrymandering concerns.
Virginia Judge Denies Attempt to Block Redistricting Amendment
Legal Challenge and Ruling
The lawsuit sought an emergency court order to stop lawmakers from advancing the proposed amendment, which would let Virginia change its congressional map in response to redistricting by other states. The judge rejected the request for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction, citing the court’s lack of power to intervene in the legislative process and the plaintiffs’ insufficient legal standing.
Redistricting Amendment and Next Steps
Passed in the General Assembly last week, the amendment would authorize the legislature to redraw congressional lines whenever another state initiates mid-decade redistricting until 2030. The measure must be passed a second time in the next session and then win approval from Virginia voters in a referendum. Democrats, holding slim majorities, argue the amendment is needed to counter nationwide “partisan attacks” on fair representation.
What’s at Stake
Republican critics argue the change undermines the bipartisan redistricting commission approved by voters in 2020. As the legal fight continues, the ultimate decision on the state’s map—and the balance of power in Virginia’s congressional delegation—could rest with voters, not judges or politicians.